Last Week on Wall Street - Week of June 8th

♦  Waterloo Capital  ♦

Last Week

on Wall Street

LEAD   Markets & Macro

A 900-Point Round Trip, and the Biggest IPO Ever to Cap It

All three major indexes finished the week modestly higher, which tells you almost nothing about how they got there. The Dow fell roughly 900 points on Wednesday as Washington signaled fresh strikes on Iran, then gained nearly all of it back on Thursday when the strikes were called off and a peace deal was suddenly described as days away. Crude oil, the metronome of this entire stretch of the market, slid to a two-month low near $84 as a 14-point memorandum of understanding took shape, with a signing floated for as soon as this weekend near the G7 summit in the French Alps.

Then came Friday. SpaceX priced its offering at $135 a share Thursday night, raised about $75 billion, more than doubling the record Saudi Aramco set in 2019, and opened on the Nasdaq at $150 under the ticker SPCX. It closed its first session up roughly 19% near $161, a valuation north of $2 trillion, and on paper made its chief executive the world's first trillionaire. The debut did more than mint a new mega cap: it pulled the rest of the space and AI infrastructure complex higher and reassured a market that had spent the spring wondering whether $75 billion of fresh equity supply could be absorbed without a wobble. It was, in a single day.

Underneath the fireworks, the week's macro story stayed tense: an inflation report confirmed what every gas station marquee has been saying since the war began, and the world's biggest sporting event kicked off across three countries, both covered in depth below. For diversified portfolios, the read on a week like this one is familiar by now. The investors who sold Wednesday's strike headlines had roughly 24 hours to regret it, while balanced exposure simply rode the round trip; the bond side even helped, with the 10-year yield drifting lower as the peace trade took oil and the inflation scare down a notch together.

STORY 01  Macro  ·  Inflation

Inflation Crossed 4% for the First Time in Three Years, and the Market Read the Fine Print

Wednesday's report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics marked the third straight month of accelerating headline inflation, with the annual rate climbing to 4.2% from 3.8% in April. The print matched expectations, which is itself part of the story: nobody on the Street was surprised that four months of a closed Strait of Hormuz had finally pushed the consumer price index above 4%. Energy did more than 60% of the monthly work, and the pain has been concentrated exactly where households feel it most, at the pump and on the utility bill, while groceries have started climbing too.

The fine print was friendlier. Core inflation, which excludes food and energy, rose just 0.2% on the month, below the consensus forecast and slower than April's pace, and core goods prices actually fell. In other words, the war premium has not yet leaked meaningfully into the underlying price structure of the economy; the gap between headline and core is essentially the conflict, measured in dollars. That distinction is what the Federal Reserve will be weighing when it meets June 17. Futures markets price a hold next week but lean toward a hike, not a cut, as the next move, and Thursday's hot producer price report kept that lean intact. The most effective disinflation policy on the table right now is not in the Fed's hands at all; it is the peace deal that knocked oil to a two-month low by Friday.

Source: CNBC: CPI inflation report, May 2026 →

STORY 02  Global Events  ·  Sports Economy

The Largest World Cup Ever Kicked Off, and the Economists Are Scoring It a Draw

Mexico opened the tournament with a 2-0 win over South Africa on Thursday night, the first match of a 48-team, 104-game edition spread across 16 cities in the United States, Mexico, and Canada over 39 days, ending July 19 at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey. The U.S. hosts 78 of the 104 matches, and Texas sits squarely in the middle of the action: Arlington's AT&T Stadium carries the largest match allocation of any host city, including a semifinal, and Houston's NRG Stadium is on the slate as well. With nearly six million fans expected through the gates, this is poised to be the largest and most-watched sporting event ever staged.

Whether any of that shows up in the economic data is a different question. FIFA projects $30.5 billion in output for the three host nations and over 800,000 jobs; Goldman Sachs economists, studying every World Cup since 1982, found that hosting produces a marginally positive but statistically insignificant effect on real output, with a long-run impact of effectively zero. The mechanics are unglamorous: much of the spending is simply redirected from other categories, the short-term lift reverses once the tournament ends, and the three host economies together represent roughly 30% of global GDP, a denominator large enough to swallow even a record-sized event. The near-term effects are real but modest, a bump to June payrolls and retail sales and an extra half-million to a million foreign visitors, and early signals suggest even that may underwhelm, with hotel rates in host cities running well below expectations and group-stage tickets priced near four figures under FIFA's first dynamic-pricing regime.

Source: Yahoo Finance: Why World Cup 2026 won't score a big goal for the US economy →

 ·   Other Things Worth Knowing   · 

Around the Water Cooler

Six stories from this week worth your morning coffee.