Last Week on Wall Street - Week of August 17th

Last Week on Wall Street

The Long End Ran the Week, and Stocks Did What They Were Told

Long yields at levels the market has not had to price in more than a decade, an intervention from Washington that lasted about a day, oil back near $95, and a three-week winning streak that finally ran out of room.

The S&P 500 closed Friday at 7,674, ending a three-week run of weekly gains. The Nasdaq gave up the most ground of the three, the Dow logged its second straight weekly loss, and the whole thing happened without a single scary print out of Washington's economic calendar. Friday itself was green, with the Dow adding roughly 500 points into the close. A good Friday does not undo the Thursday that came before it.

The pressure came from the far end of the curve, and the reasons behind it are stacking rather than rotating: federal deficit spending, a corporate bond calendar running at record size, and a wave of AI-linked issuance funding data centers, power contracts, and fiber. The Treasury Department stepped in midweek to lean against the move. The relief lasted about a day. Meanwhile crude came back toward $95 a barrel after the United Arab Emirates suspended all trade with Iran on Wednesday, which makes the inflation arithmetic at the long end harder in every direction at once.

For diversified portfolios, the notable thing about this week is not the size of the equity give-back, which was modest, but where the volatility actually lived. Stocks had no session worse than 1%. The bond market moved hard twice in five days and in both directions, and the asset that ran furthest was the one with no cash flows at all. Duration is doing something it has not done in a decade: paying a real coupon and swinging like an equity, at the same time. The portfolios sitting comfortably through a week like this are the ones that bought their fixed income for the yield rather than the trade, and are being paid to hold it while the long end argues with itself.

Washington Doubled Its Bond Buybacks, and the Market Handed the Rally Back in a Day

The key takeaway, the Treasury told the market on Wednesday it would at least double the size of its long-dated bond buybacks. Long yields fell on the news, then gave the entire move back inside twenty-four hours. By Friday the long end sat roughly where it had started the week, which is to say near the highest levels in more than a decade.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the department would lift its long-dated repurchase operations from $2 billion to at least $4 billion apiece, effective September 9. Long bonds rallied on Wednesday, the way any market rallies when a very large buyer announces itself. By Thursday afternoon the move was gone. The 10-year finished the week near 4.74% and the 30-year near 5.25%, both back at the levels that prompted the intervention in the first place, and Bessent spent Friday promising the operations could get bigger still.

Buybacks change the shape of what is outstanding, not the size of what has to be issued, and that distinction is what the market spent Thursday pricing. A few billion dollars per operation is real support for liquidity in specific off-the-run issues; it is not an answer to a deficit, a record investment-grade calendar, and an oil price that keeps drifting up. The deeper number is the real yield: the 30-year inflation-adjusted rate touched roughly 3.0% in late July, the highest since 2008, meaning investors are demanding compensation for lending long that they have not asked for since the financial crisis. That is the message a fiscal authority cannot buy its way out of, and it lands a week before the new Federal Reserve chairman gives his first Jackson Hole address.

SOURCE: CNBC: Longer-dated Treasury yields rise as the buyback rally fizzles →

Bitcoin Had Its Best Week in Two Years, and It Was a Rulebook That Did It

The key takeaway, bitcoin rose close to 23% over five sessions that took stocks lower and long yields higher, its biggest weekly gain in more than two years. The catalyst was not a price call. It was the first crypto-specific fundraising rule the Securities and Exchange Commission has written in its ninety-year history.

On August 18 the SEC published Regulation Crypto Assets, which lays out three ways a digital-asset project can raise money inside securities law: a $5 million exemption for startups, a $75 million exemption that requires audited financials, and a conditional safe harbor letting an asset exit securities classification once the managerial promises in its original investment contract have been fulfilled or abandoned. The next day the White House convened crypto and finance executives, with the president pressing Congress to move the CLARITY Act, whose House vote has slipped to September. Bitcoin touched $79,319 on Friday and spent the afternoon near $77,600.

Part of the move was mechanical: the Treasury buyback announcement pushed long yields down for a session, risk appetite followed, and roughly $3 billion of short positions were liquidated into a thin market. The rest is a repricing of regulatory risk that has hung over the asset class since 2023, when the operative question was which token was a security and the operative answer was whichever one the agency sued next. What makes the week worth noting is not the percentage. It is that the same five sessions produced the best crypto tape since 2024 and the worst equity tape in a month, from an asset that still sits roughly 38% below the record it set last October.

SOURCE: CNBC: Bitcoin on track for 23% weekly gain as optimism floods back →

Technical trading models are mathematically driven based upon historical data and trends of domestic and foreign market trading activity, including various industry and sector trading statistics within such markets. Technical trading models, through mathematical algorithms, attempt to identify when markets are likely to increase or decrease and identify appropriate entry and exit points. The primary risk of technical trading models is that historical trends and past performance cannot predict future trends and there is no assurance that the mathematical algorithms employed are designed properly, updated with new data, and can accurately predict future market, industry and sector performance.

Disclosure: Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal and fluctuation of value. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This newsletter is not intended to be relied upon as forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of the date noted and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this letter are derived from proprietary and nonproprietary sources deemed by Waterloo Capital to be reliable. The letter may contain "forward-looking" information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecast made will materialize. Reliance upon information in this letter is at sole discretion of the reader. Please consult with a Waterloo Capital financial advisor to ensure that any contemplated transaction in any securities or investment strategy mentioned in this newsletter aligns with your overall investment goals, objectives and tolerance for risk. Additional information about Waterloo Capital is available in its current disclosure documents, Form ADV, Form ADV Part 2A Brochure, and Client Relationship Summary report which are accessible online via the SEC's Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) database at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov, using SEC # 133705. Waterloo Capital is neither an attorney nor an accountant, and no portion of this content should be interpreted as legal, accounting or tax advice.